Legal Opinion
United States v. Orenic
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided June 9, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 85-0012-HPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*585MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL, District Judge.
This matter is here on the motion of the United States for reconsideration of its previous motion to review costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court. This action was originally brought to collect the unpaid balance of a student loan on which the defendant had defaulted. The Court subsequently entered a consent judgment which allowed for recovery of $952.54, “plus costs and interest.” The United States Attorney subsequently filed a bill of costs which included two fees pertaining to a state court lien, the $20.00 docket fee provided for under 28…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Alspach v. District Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Gulf Refining Co. of La. v. NorvellSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Nash v. RaunDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Norman Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Scallet v. RosenblumDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
- Ronald L. Jordan v. John VercoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. SpannDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- Waugh v. WeinhoeftDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022