Legal Opinion

Nash v. Raun

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1946No. Civ. A. 53 (Erie)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit in trespass to recover for personal injuries and damages to his automobile sustained in a collision with a motor truck driven by defendant on October 9, 1941. Defendant’s answer denied liability and alleged as a counterclaim an action against plaintiff for damages to defendant’s truck, for loss of use thereof and for damages to milk supply which was being hauled on said truck.

This case came on for trial before the late Judge Schoonmaker with the result that the jury returned the following verdict : “And now, to wit: October 5, 1943, we, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Gold Dust Corporation v. HoffenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. John R. Alley & Co. v. Federal Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. City of Orlando v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mobile Power Enterprises, Inc. v. Power Vac, Inc., and Anilas Corporation, Eugene Ashley Gaiters v. Power Vac, Inc., and Anilas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959
  3. United States v. OrenicDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
  4. Mabel Dale Ingvoldstad ex rel. Meyer v. Kings Wharf Island Enterprises, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API