Legal Opinion

Hanno v. Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 21, 1992No. 30888-2-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Patricia Hanno, a longshore worker, filed suit against petitioner Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd., for injuries allegedly sustained while working on a Neptune vessel. The trial judge denied petitioner's motion for a new judge. Neptune filed a motion for discretionary review. A commissioner of this court granted the motion on the ground that the trial judge committed obvious error, RAP 2.3(b)(1). The commissioner also stayed the trial cotut proceedings pending this appeal. The matter was referred to this panel for accelerated review pursuant to RAP 18.12. We reverse and remand.

On January…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. GudjonssonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re the Marriage of LemonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of LemonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ParraWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Godfrey v. Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. In re the Marriage of TyeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. In re the Marriage of HennemannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. State v. DetrickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API