Legal Opinion

Leikam v. Edson Express

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1987No. 87-015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

*67Claimant, Robert W. Leikam, appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court denying his motion to enter judgment in his favor after the parties stipulated to defendant’s liability and to vacate trial.

We affirm the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court.

The issues presented for review by claimant in this case are:

1. Whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in denying claimant’s motion for entry of judgment.

2. Whether claimant is entitled to an award of attorney fees pursuant to Section 39-71-611, MCA.

The facts in this case are undisputed.

Appellant, Robert Leikam, was a long…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lasar v. E.H. Oftedal & SonsMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Yearout v. Rainbow PaintingMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cosgrove v. Industrial Indemnity CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNeel v. Holy Rosary HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McNeel v. Holy Rosary HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. McNeel v. Holy Rosary HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API