Legal Opinion

Lasar v. E.H. Oftedal & Sons

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1986No. 85-479PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

John D. Lasar, the claimant, appeals a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court denying him an award of costs and attorneys’ fees. He does not appeal the denial of a lump sum award or the denial of an imposition of the 20% penalty made as part of the same judgment. We affirm.

The claimant was injured in 1979 while employed by E.H. Oftedal & Sons, a Montana employer insured by the State Compensation Insurance Fund (defendant). The defendant paid temporary total disability wage loss benefits from the time of the accident.

On November 30, 1984 the claimant petitioned for a hearing requesting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krause v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bell v. RichardsMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McKinley v. American Dental Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Komeotis v. Williamson FencingMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sciuchetti v. Hurt ConstructionMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Madill v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API