Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McNeel v. Holy Rosary Hospital

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1987No. 87-052Published

1Concurrence

MR. JUSTICE HUNT,

specially concurring:

I concur with the result in the majority opinion in light of the statutory language and controlling precedent. I wish to emphasize, however, that this is a particularly unfortunate and harsh result.

Section 39-71-611, MCA, must not become a weapon in the hands of the insurance companies operating in this state by forcing employees to incur the cost of trial preparation and then settling at or *428just before trial. See Leikam v. Edson Express (Mont. 1987), [228 Mont. 66,] 740 P.2d 1130, 44 St.Rep. 1347, 1350 (Sheehy, J., dissenting).

Under such circumstances an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Western Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hayes v. Aetna Fire UnderwritersMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Birkenbuel v. Montana State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Leikam v. Edson ExpressMontana Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API