McNeel v. Holy Rosary Hospital
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
MR. JUSTICE HUNT,
specially concurring:
I concur with the result in the majority opinion in light of the statutory language and controlling precedent. I wish to emphasize, however, that this is a particularly unfortunate and harsh result.
Section 39-71-611, MCA, must not become a weapon in the hands of the insurance companies operating in this state by forcing employees to incur the cost of trial preparation and then settling at or *428just before trial. See Leikam v. Edson Express (Mont. 1987), [228 Mont. 66,] 740 P.2d 1130, 44 St.Rep. 1347, 1350 (Sheehy, J., dissenting).
Under such circumstances an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gibson v. Western Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Hayes v. Aetna Fire UnderwritersMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Birkenbuel v. Montana State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Leikam v. Edson ExpressMontana Supreme Court · 1987