Kalb v. City of West Helena
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Certain property owners who objected to annexation of their property to the City of West Helena have appealed from a judgment of the circuit court annexing the territory.
Mildred Scott asserts that the court erred in holding that her land was suitable to, or of such character as to be subject to, annexation. She contends that it was vacant and did not derive special value from its adaptability for city uses. Van Sant Kalb and others assert that their property was not suitable for city use because it was used for agricultural and horticultural purposes and because it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Clark v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Clements v. Crawford County BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
- Vogel v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Brown v. Peach OrchardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blundell v. City of West HelenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Patrick v. McSperittCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- City of Lebanon v. Goodin ex rel. GoodinKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- May v. Lee CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.