Legal Opinion

Macquarie Bank Limited v. Bradley D. Knickel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2015No. 14-1683, 14-1684PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Macquarie Bank Limited (Macquarie Bank) and a subsidiary brought suit against LexMac Energy, L.P. (LexMac); Novus Operating Company, L.P. (Novus); Lexar Energy, Inc. (Lexar); and Bradley Kniekel, who controls all three companies, (collectively, Lexar Group). Macquarie Bank and the subsidiary alleged claims of deceit, fraud, and promissory estoppel, among others, and also alleged that the corporate veil of the three companies should be pierced to hold Kniekel personally liable. In their answer, LexMac, Novus, and Lexar sought • declaratory judgment and alleged claims of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Beard Research, Inc. v. KatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  3. Eckert v. Titan Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Mosley v. City Of NorthwoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Sunac Petroleum Corporation v. ParkesTexas Supreme Court · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Steves and Sons, Inc. v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. STABL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Lenny M. Chapman v. Missouri Basin Well ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Metro Sales, Inc. v. Core Consulting Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  5. Faltermeier v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API