Legal Opinion
Mercado-Amador v. Reno
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 4, 1999No. Civ 98-1593-REPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION. AND ORDER
REDDEN, District Judge.
The matter before the court is the defendants’ motion to amend the judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. During oral argument on that motion, defendants raised the question of whether this court has jurisdiction in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) (“AADC ”). I conclude that the court does have jurisdiction. On the merits, defendants’ motion to amend the judgment is denied.
Procedural Background
Roberto…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8943, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,491 Veronico Blas Almario Kalaw Eleanor Lu Dalisay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Florencia Garcia Revilla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Anastacia Miranda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolde Wallace v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Alanis-Bustamante v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Dunbar v. INSDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Prado Hernandez v. RenoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1999
- Canela v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.