Legal Opinion
Alanis-Bustamante v. Reno
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 25, 2000No. 98-3689PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Eduardo Alanis-Bustamante contends that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) erroneously applied the 1996 amendments to the Immigration and Nationalization Act (“INA”) to his removal proceeding, which rendered him ineligible for an INA § 212(c) waiver of deportation. After the BIA ordered Bustamante removed from the United States, he sought judicial review of his removal by filing a habeas corpus petition in the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court held that the Illegal Immigrant Removal and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”), one of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Edison JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Richardson v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Wolde Wallace v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mazen Al Najjar v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Hugo Armendariz-Montoya v. Roseanne C. Sonchik, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Patrick Oguejiofor v. Attorney General of the United States, Office of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Lennox Thom v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Sikiru Balogun v. United States Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.