Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rusinko

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1982No. 2674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Appellant Michael J. Rusinko has taken this appeal from the trial court’s denial, without a hearing, of his Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition. We find that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing appellant’s petition and we therefore reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant pled guilty on September 17, 1979, to one count of indecent assault, one count of escape, and four counts of burglary. Pursuant to a plea negotiation, the Commonwealth nol prossed two other charges. No petition to withdraw the guilty plea was filed. On November 1, 1979,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StraderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. PaigeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. McCallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. HendersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PullingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API