Commonwealth v. Henderson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
Appellant, James Robert Henderson, takes this appeal from the trial court’s denial, without hearing, of his Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition at which Henderson argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for persuading him to plead guilty to the charge of unlawful possession and delivery of controlled substances. Henderson asserts that he was assured that he could receive “county time” in exchange for his plea. He received a sentence of two to five years imprisonment to be served at a state institution. The trial court in its opinion denying Henderson’s PCHA…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MabieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. StraderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. LaboySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. NahodilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CappelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. EdringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. CofieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. PullingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. RusinkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.