Commonwealth v. Clark
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
Appellant entered an open plea of guilty to the charges of robbery 1 and conspiracy to commit robbery 2 and was sentenced to five to fifteen years. A petition to reconsider the sentence was filed and denied. Appellant did not file a motion challenging the validity of the guilty plea pursuant to Rule 321 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure nor was a direct appeal taken in the case. Subsequently, however, appellant filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (hereinafter PCHA) challenging his convictions. Within this petition, appellant faulted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. RosmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joseph George Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RusinkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. NastariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.