Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clark

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1982No. 2198 and 248PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

Appellant entered an open plea of guilty to the charges of robbery 1 and conspiracy to commit robbery 2 and was sentenced to five to fifteen years. A petition to reconsider the sentence was filed and denied. Appellant did not file a motion challenging the validity of the guilty plea pursuant to Rule 321 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure nor was a direct appeal taken in the case. Subsequently, however, appellant filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (hereinafter PCHA) challenging his convictions. Within this petition, appellant faulted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. RosmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joseph George Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. RusinkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. NastariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API