Legal Opinion
Timmer v. Talbot
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 4, 1936No. 3703PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
A summary of the two stipulations of fact filed in this cause appears in the findings of fact filed with this opinion. Nothing would be gained by repetition.
Act No. 18 of the Extra Session of the Michigan Legislature of 1934 provides that every mortgage intended to operate as a mortgage of goods and chattels covering future advancements shall be absolutely void as against the creditors of the mortgagor beyond the sum stated therein. The constitutionality of the statute has been sustained by this court. See opinion filed herein December 16, 1935, 13 F.Supp. 666. The act…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ransom & Randolph Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Arnesto Paint Co. v. BrushNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Timmer v. TalbotDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rolando v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In re JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1938
- Kearney v. National Brass & Copper Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950