Biddy v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for escape and auto theft.
1. The evidence supports the verdict on both counts. Defendant’s contention that intent to escape was not shown is without merit. (He said that he had left the work gang to answer a call of nature and then fell asleep in the woods). His intent may be inferred from the fact that he was absent for six days and had crossed county lines.
2. On the trip back to the public works camp after defendant’s voluntary surrender, the warden told him that an automobile had been stolen in the vicinity of his escape.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LaRueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Whitfield v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Overby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.