Potts v. State

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from conviction for escape from custody.

1. When objection to a question on cross examination is made but later withdrawn and the question is answered, no harmful error is shown. Mitchell v. Schofield’s Sons Co., 19 Ga. App. 201 (1) (91 SE 275). Here, the record shows that defendant’s counsel had thorough cross examination relating to the answer.

2. Where an indictment for murder, the verdict of voluntary manslaughter and sentence of 18 years is introduced to show proper confinement in a trial for escape, and proper instructions are given by the judge…