Legal Opinion

Davis v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1939No. Nos. 34,063, 34,064, 34,065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

The action of Courtney B. Davis against H. J. Sherman was one to recover a money judgment from the defendant, a co-tenant, in an oil-and-gas lease, and to obtain a lien on the interest of his cotenant. The amount sought constituted a proportionate share for the drilling of an oil well on the lease, which resulted in a dry hole. Plaintiff instituted identical separate actions against the defendants, P. J. McIntyre and C. C. Cummings. The issues in each of the actions are identical and the appeals are consolidated. Judgment went for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Menges & Mange Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Gaudreau v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Markham v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John Carey Oil Co. v. W.C.P. InvestmentsIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Doman Hunting & Fishing Ass'n v. DomanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Mann v. StaatzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Krug v. KrugCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  5. Klima Well Service, Inc. v. HurleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API