Legal Opinion

Krug v. Krug

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 24, 1980No. 50,727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foth, C.J.:

The issue in this case is how to accommodate the

interests of cotenants in a mineral estate who cannot agree upon a lessee for oil and gas exploration. The facts are undisputed; the only question is whether the trial court’s order was one which it could properly make under its equitable powers.

The ten plaintiffs collectively own 9/llths of the minerals under a half-section of land in Russell County. The defendant Ray R. Krug (hereafter “Krug”) owns the other 2/llths, as well as the surface. Beginning in 1975 plaintiffs executed a series of oil and gas leases to the defendant Cities…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Brooks v. MullSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Compton v. People's Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Minnesota Avenue, Inc. v. Automatic Packagers, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Witmer v. Estate of BrosiusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gabaig v. GabaigAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dexter v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. Palmer v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  4. Estate of Powell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. Dexter v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API