Krug v. Krug
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, C.J.:
The issue in this case is how to accommodate the
interests of cotenants in a mineral estate who cannot agree upon a lessee for oil and gas exploration. The facts are undisputed; the only question is whether the trial court’s order was one which it could properly make under its equitable powers.
The ten plaintiffs collectively own 9/llths of the minerals under a half-section of land in Russell County. The defendant Ray R. Krug (hereafter “Krug”) owns the other 2/llths, as well as the surface. Beginning in 1975 plaintiffs executed a series of oil and gas leases to the defendant Cities…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Brooks v. MullSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Compton v. People's Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Minnesota Avenue, Inc. v. Automatic Packagers, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Witmer v. Estate of BrosiusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gabaig v. GabaigAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Dexter v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Palmer v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
- Estate of Powell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Dexter v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.