Legal Opinion
Conley v. King Bridge Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 18, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. Suit by Thomas Conley against the King Bridge Company. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
There are two patents set up in the bill of complaint, which are alleged to be susceptible of conjoint use, and to have been infringed by the defendant. The first, No. 701,544, dated June 3, 1902, for a guide for punching presses, was issued to Thomas Conley and John R. Conley. The second, No. 735,469, a gauge for punching machines, was issued August 4, 1903, to Thomas Conley. John R. Conley assigned all of his interest in the first patent to the complainant November 2, 1907. The alleged infringing devices of the defendant are made in conformity with two patents; the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hendy v. Golden State & Miners' Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Busell Trimmer Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States Peg-Wood, Shank & Leather Board Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- Wolff v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conley v. ThomasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
- Conley v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914