Hendy v. Golden State & Miners' Iron Works
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE- UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. This was.a sujt.in equity, brought by Joshua Hendv against the Golden State and Miners’ Iron Works, a corporation, and six individual - defendants, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California, for the infringement of letters patent No. 140,250, granted June 24, 1873, to James D. Cusenbary and James A. Mars, for an “improvement in ore-stamp feeders.”
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE- UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. This was.a sujt.in equity, brought by Joshua Hendv against the Golden State and Miners’ Iron Works, a corporation, and six individual - defendants, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California, for the infringement of letters patent No. 140,250, granted June 24, 1873, to James D. Cusenbary and James A. Mars, for an “improvement in ore-stamp feeders.” The specification^ claims, and drawings of the patent were as follows :■ “ Our invention relates to improvements in that class of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchfobd
Infringement is alleged of only the first claim, namely, .“ The feeding cylinder I, mounted upon the movable timbers H H, substantially as and for the purpose above described.” The specification states, in regard to the subject of the first claim, that the improvement consists “in mounting a feed cylinder upon a movable frame or truck, so that it can be readily shifted from place to place when it is desired to repair the mill.” The specification speaks of the timbers H H as being the foundation timbers upon which the feeding cylinder is mounted, and it says that those timbers “ are mounted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Florsheim v. SchillingSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co. v. C. Aultman & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.