Conley v. Thomas
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by- Thomas Conley against George P. Thomas, trading as the Standard Bridge Tool Company. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, District Judge.
The complainant sets up in his bill that the patent No. 701,544, granted to Thomas and John R. Conley, dated June 3, 1902, and duly assigned to complainant, has been infringed by defendant’s device made in conformity with patent No. 908,818, granted to George P. Thomas and dated January 5, 1909. The defenses are invalidity of the Conley patent and noninfringement.
[1] The Conley patent was before the court in the case of Conley v. King Bridge Co. (C. C.) 175 Fed. 79, and upon appeal from that decision was in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Conley v. King Bridge Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1909
- Conley v. King Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Lektophone Corp. v. Miller Bros.District Court, D. Delaware · 1930
- Bellows-Claude Neon Co. v. Sun Ray Gas Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1929
- Flat Slabs Patents Co. v. Wright, Barrett & Stilwell Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1920
- Smith v. CuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.