Rodney Lee Lincoln v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtClifford H. Ahrens, Judge
Rodney Lee Lincoln (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his Amended Motion for Release pursuant to section 547.037 RSMo (Cum.Supp.2004). 1 Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred denying his Amended Motion for Release because DNA testing proved that the expert hair comparison evidence was false, and that he is more likely than not to be innocent, such that no rational finder of fact could fairly find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes. Movant also argues that the State of Missouri should be estopped from pursuing a new theory of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jon Keith Smith v. Michael Groose Missouri Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- State v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Fujita v. JeffriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re: Rodney L. Lincoln v. Jay Cassady, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State of Missouri v. Anthony DixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019