Legal Opinion

Hale v. Pena

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1999No. 2-99-018-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

This suit arises out of an automobile collision involving an on-duty police officer responding to an emergency call. Police Officer James Michael Hale appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment. He argues that he is immune from suit under the doctrine of official immunity, and that he is immune from liability because at the time of the collision, he drove the emergency vehicle in compliance with Chapter 546 of the Texas Transportation Code. Because we find that Officer Hale failed to establish either of the affirmative defenses as a matter of law and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of GrapevineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. City of San Angelo Fire Department v. Hudson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  3. Cantu v. Peacher, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  4. Smith v. Janda Ex Rel. Janda, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  5. Hayes v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API