Magaña v. Hyundai Motor America
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.
¶1 Trial courts need not tolerate deliberate and willful discovery abuse. Given the unique facts and circumstances of this case, we hold that the trial court appropriately diagnosed Hyundai’s willful efforts to frustrate and undermine truthful pretrial discovery efforts by striking its pleadings and rendering an $8,000,000 default judgment plus reasonable attorney fees. This result appropriately compensates the other party and hopefully educates and deters others inclined to similar behavior.
¶2 We determine the trial court acted well within its discretion and reverse the Court of Appeals,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Jones v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Teter v. DeckWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Marina Condominium Homeowner's Ass'n v. Stratford at the Marina, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.