Legal Opinion

Gaskill v. Barnett

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1913No. 7,867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom Greene Circuit Court; Charles E. Henderson, Judge. Action by John A. Gaskill against Clarence C. Barnett. Prom a judgment- for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, P. J.

Appellant filed suit against appellee in two paragraphs of complaint. The first paragraph is for damages alleged to have been caused by appellee’s construction of a dam across a natural watercourse, and for a mandatory injunction to compel the removal of said obstruction. The second paragraph seeks damages for the obstruction of an easement, and also to quiet title thereto. Issues were joined by a general denial, and the cause was tried by the court. On request the court made a special finding of facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon, to which appellant duly excepted. The only error…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BainIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Shelbyville & Brandywine Turnpike Co. v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Capes v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Vandalia Railroad v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Monarch Real Estate Co. v. FryeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Kramer v. RagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Newton v. LyonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API