Legal Opinion

State v. Lansdowne

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 28, 2002No. Nos. 20381-6-III; 20382-4-III; 20385-9-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

Jacqueline and Mark Lansdowne were separately charged with unlawful imprisonment. The charges arise out of their contact with an insurance inspector who unexpectedly appeared at their home. In a separate incident, Jacqueline Lansdowne was charged with one count of telephone harassment for calling her daughter’s school and threatening one of the teachers. The trial court granted the Lansdownes’ Knapstad1 motion to dismiss all of the charges ruling that, based upon the material undisputed facts, the State could not establish prima facie cases for the charges. We reverse both the dismissal of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. State v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. State v. LansdowneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API