Legal Opinion
State v. Alphonse
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 29, 2008No. 58449-9-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
197 P.3d 1211 (2008)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Edison ALPHONSE, Appellant.
No. 58449-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
December 29, 2008.
Thomas Marshal Curtis, Snohomish County Prosecutor, Everett, WA, for Respondent.
Susan F. Wilk, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
AGID, J.
¶ 1 Edison Alphonse appeals his convictions for felony and misdemeanor telephone harassment. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, asserting that RCW 9.61.230 must be construed to require proof that he had the intent to harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass when he…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Marriage of MeredithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Gina M. Childs v. Robert A. Ballou Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Jack Potter v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.