Legal Opinion
State v. Alphonse
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 7, 2008No. 58449-9-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
174 P.3d 684 (2008)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Edison ALPHONSE, Appellant.
No. 58449-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
January 7, 2008.
Susan F. Wilk, Washington Appellate Project, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Thomas Marshal Curtis, Snohomish County Pros. Ofc., Everett, WA, for Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
AGID, J.
¶ 1 Edison Alphonse appeals his convictions for felony and misdemeanor telephone harassment. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, asserting that RCW 9.61.230 must be construed to require proof that he had the intent to harass,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008