Legal Opinion
Abing v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1982No. Civ. 4-82-555PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
On March 19, 1982, William and Vicky Abing commenced an action against defendants Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, a registered broker/dealer of securities, and Robert Ploetz, manager of Paine, Webber’s office in Rochester, Minnesota. The plaintiffs commenced the action in the District Court for Olmsted County, Minnesota. On March 31, 1982, the defendants filed a petition for removal of the action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The matter is now before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion to remand the matter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- John Jones v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- U. S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Kinsey v. NESTOR EXPLORATION LTD.-1981ADistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1985
- Nelson v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Charles Gonsalves v. Amoco Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.