Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1992No. Civ. 4-92-286, 4-92-287PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motions to remand. The motion will be denied.
FACTS
Plaintiffs in these two related actions are credit card customers of the defendant banks. 1 Defendants are national banks located in states other than Minnesota. Plaintiffs, all residents of Minnesota, brought suit in state court, challenging defendants’ practice of charging late fees and overlimit fees in addition to periodic interest charges. The fees assessed by the defendant banks are permitted by the laws of the states in which the defendants are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Copeland v. MBNA America, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 1993
- Copeland v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.