Legal Opinion

State ex rel Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 2014No. 268A12-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In this case we consider whether the order of the North Carolina Utilities Commission (“the Commission”) authorizing a 10.5% return on equity (“ROE”) for Duke Energy Carolinas (“Duke”) contained sufficient findings of fact to demonstrate that the order was supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence in view of the entire record. See N.C.G.S. § 62-94 (2013). Because we conclude that the Commission made sufficient findings of fact regarding the impact of changing economic conditions upon customers, we affirm. See id. § 62-94(b).

On 1 July 2011, Duke filed an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Utilities Comm'n v. Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. N.C. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Indus. Grp. for Fair Util. Rates IISupreme Court of North Carolina · 2026
  2. State ex rel. N.C. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Indus. Grp. for Fair Util. Rates IIISupreme Court of North Carolina · 2026
  3. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. SteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. SteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API