Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 2014No. 424A13PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In this case we consider whether the order of the North Carolina Utilities Commission (“the Commission”) authorizing a 10.2% return on equity (“ROE”) for Duke Energy Progress (“DEP”) contained sufficient findings of fact to demonstrate that it was supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence in view of the entire record. See N.C.G.S. § 62-94 (2013). Because we conclude that the Commission made sufficient findings of fact regarding the impact of changing economic conditions upon customers, we affirm. See id. § 62-94(b).

On 12 October 2012, DEP filed an application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Comm'n v. Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  3. State ex rel. N.C. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Indus. Grp. for Fair Util. Rates IISupreme Court of North Carolina · 2026
  4. State ex rel. N.C. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Indus. Grp. for Fair Util. Rates IIISupreme Court of North Carolina · 2026
  5. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API