Legal Opinion

Chance v. Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey, Combined Shows Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1970PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed an action for personal injuries sustained in a fall while on her way to a circus operated by defendant at the Portland Memorial Coliseum. After a jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, the trial court granted a judgment n.o.v. for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

In considering a motion for a judgment n.o.v. the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom must be considered in the light most favorable to the party obtaining the verdict. Yates v. Starting, 219 Or 464, 347 P2d 839 (1959).

Plaintiff, an elderly woman, and her nephew purchased tickets to the circus…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kraft v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Barnett v. La Mesa Post No. 282California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gardner v. KoenigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Baley v. J. F. Hink & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. German v. Kienow's Food StoresOregon Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Westberry v. BlackwellOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kathren v. OlenikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Baker v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Baker v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Baker v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API