Legal Opinion

Baley v. J. F. Hink & Son

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1955No. Civ. 16271PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for personal injuries sustained while plaintiff was a customer in the department store of respondent, J. F. Hink and Son, in Berkeley. A nonsuit *104was likewise granted on plaintiff’s suit against the defendant Doris Potter, a customer in the aforesaid store, whose leashed dog was alleged to have been the cause of appellant’s fall from which she suffered serious personal injuries.

Appellant’s complaint against respondent Hink alleged that appellant was a business invitee; that respondent Doris Potter owned a dog which she knew…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dickson v. . McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LairdWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Schwartz v. Armand Erpf EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Nevarez v. Thriftimart, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Rogers v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API