Legal Opinion
Mayes v. Jackson Township Rent Leveling Board
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 1, 1986PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
These cases present challenges to certain rent control provisions found in two municipal ordinances. Both ordinances use an investment-based formula to determine adjustments of allowable rents to assure a fair return to the owners. In both cases the Law Division upheld the ordinances and the Appellate Division affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the trial court. We granted certification in these two cases, 102 N.J. 318 (1985), because of an apparent conflict in the decisions below as to whether an investment-based formula for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Helmsley v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. JosephsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Rivkin v. Dover Township Rent Leveling BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Heyert v. TaddeseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Pinewood Estates of Michigan and Philou Associates, Ltd. v. Barnegat Township Leveling Board, Township of Barnegat, Barnegat Township CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.