Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 2000No. 25220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

In this domestic case, Frederick Hopkins (Father), acting pro se, seeks reimbursement of overpayments of child support, attorneys’ fees, 1 and pre- and post-judgment interest from his ex-wife, Carol Hopkins (Mother).

FACTS

Mother and Father were married in 1967; they divorced in May 1983. They had two children: Sean, born May 26, 1972, and Fred, bom December 4,1969. Father was ordered to pay child support of $350.00 per month. In November 1986, Father was found to be $18,693.00 in arrears in his child support, and an order garnishing $432.60 per month of his military disability…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hallums v. HallumsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Risinger v. RisingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. Lisa v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Epperly v. EpperlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. McMillan v. South Carolina Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Williamson v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Young v. Midwest Family Mut. Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dixie Bell, Inc. v. ReddCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API