Legal Opinion
Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 11, 2003No. 25697PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
This is a class action in which the trial court granted Respondents/Appellants (“Buyers”) summary judgment based on Appellant/Respondent’s, Pacesetter Corporation (“Pacesetter”), failure to comply with the attorney and insurance agent preference provisions of the South Carolina Consumer Protection Code. 1 This Court affirmed summary judgment on the issue of liability and remanded for a determination on damages. Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp., 333 S.C. 33, 508 S.E.2d 16 (1998) (“Tilley I”). This appeal was taken following the circuit court’s determination of damages.
Factual/Procedural Background
Pac…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Paschal v. State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Smith v. TiffanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.