Legal Opinion
Baird Rubber & Trading Co. v. Bates
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1924No. 3935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENEOOPER, District Judge.
On March 14, 1921, Baird Rubber & Trading Company, Inc., appellant her^n, entered into two written contracts for the sale of rubber to the Portage Rubber Company, for arrival and delivery in New York City in May and June of that year. Part of the rubber so sold was delivered in accordance with the contract, and delivery of the balance was postponed upon request of the purchaser. On May 31, 1921, three creditors of the Portage Rubber Company filed a petition in involuntary bankruptcy against it, and immediately afterward the Portage Rubber Company filed its answer,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stern v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- First Nat. Bank of Pikeville v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Erie Malleable Co. v. Standard Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Vogt Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel &. Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924