Legal Opinion

Vogt Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel &. Iron Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1924No. 3948Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Upon application for rehearing, defendant in error challenges the rule of damages adopted by the opinion as'to the April, May, and June deliveries, and insists that the last day of each month should have been adopted as the critical date. This insistence is based on Avery v. Bowden, 5 Ellis & Blackburn, 714. We find nothing in this case, or in the principles there established, inconsistent with the result reached in the opinion. That case announces only the now undisputed rule that an anticipatory breach by one party does not terminate the contract, unless the other party…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wheeler v. New Brunswick & Canada RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Crystal Paper Co. v. Robertson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  4. Baird Rubber & Trading Co. v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API