Legal Opinion
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Johnson & Higgins
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 11, 1998No. 93 CIV. 5481 (LBS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
The Court has before it Defendant Johnson & Higgins’ (“J & H”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) pursuant to. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) seeking a dismissal of Plaintiffs claims for monetary and injunctive relief on the basis of waivers of rights signed by the retired directors of J & H. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is Denied.
BACKGROUND
On December 28, 1994, the EEOC had filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment alleging that Defendant’s mandatory, pre-65 retirement policy for its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richard A. LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADIRONDACK BEVERAGE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John R. Wastak v. Lehigh Valley Health NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Aiena v. OlsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Massachusetts v. Bull HN Information Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- John R. Wastak v. Lehigh Valley Health NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.