Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Inman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;'—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of DeWitt county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

Upon the hearing of appellant’s bill for an accounting of the partnership affairs of Inman & Randolph with his former partner, appellee, the court sustained certain exceptions of each party to the report of the master and overruled others, and found to be due appellant $3112.85. A decree was entered for that amount and requiring each party to pay one-half the costs. Appellant sued out a writ of error from the Appellate Court for the Third District, and the decree was affirmed in that court. Prom the judgment of affirmance he has prosecuted this appeal.

The master found and reported that there…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brownell v. SteereIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Parish v. BainumIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Williams v. HenkleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  4. Taylor v. SnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API