Legal Opinion

Klarenbeek v. Campbell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1980No. 12878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Dianna Klarenbeek (Klarenbeek) from a jury verdict in favor of defendant Arthur Campbell (Campbell). Klarenbeek moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The trial court issued an order denying this motion. We reverse and remand for a new trial solely on the issue of damages.

The facts of this ease are very simple. This action arises out of an automobile accident which occurred on September 17,1975, in a private parking lot in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The parking lot is adjacent to Minnesota Avenue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stenholtz v. ModicaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jensen v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Corey v. KocerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Haw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., and to Use of GiacomoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Roger MacHanic v. Kate StoreyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baddou v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Junge v. JerzakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. CartagenaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Estate of TankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Cooper v. RangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API