Typothetae v. Typographical Union No. 6
New York Supreme Court
Motion to direct execution of an order adjudging defend- Jj ants guilty of a criminal contempt. The opinion states the/ case.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
The respondents before me have been adjudged guilty of a criminal contempt of court in violating an injunction order heretofore granted. As officers of the defendant Typographical Union No. 6 they so acted as to further the commission of acts of violence and intimidation upon the part of members of the union during the course of a labor dispute, which acts it was the duty of these officers to endeavor to prevent according to the court’s mandate. After successive appeals to the Appellate Division and Court of Appeals, resulting in affirmance in each instance, this court is now asked to direct…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- People Ex Rel. Forsyth v. . Court of SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Curran v. . GalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Middlebrook v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Davis v. ZimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People ex rel. Frank v. McCannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Schwarcz v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. . DonnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927