Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1927No. 18080Published

1Dissent

RILEY. J.

(dissenting). I cannot concur in the opinion by which a writ of mandamus was issued to Justice Clark and myself compelling us to certify our disqualifications to sit in this cause.

In obedience to said writ I did, on the 4th day of February. 1927, so certify my disqualification to His Excel'ency, the Governor, as I was commanded to do.

Th'e material facts are as follows:

On the 13th day of January, 1927, the respondent Martin, who had been formerly cited for contempt by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, in this proceeding filed a motion to disqualify six certain Justices of this court,…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API