Legal Opinion
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided May 5, 1972No. LR-70-C-203PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION NUMBER SIX
EISELE, District Judge.
On January 13, 1972, the defendants filed with the Court the new environmental impact statement and simultaneously filed a motion for summary judgment in which they have asked the Court to dissolve and set aside the injunction. 1 The plaintiffs thereupon filed a comprehensive brief in opposition to the defendants’ motion, contending, among other things, that there were genuine issues of fact yet to be disposed of. 2 Plaintiffs first contended that defendants’ new EIS was “not impartial and objective”. Court and counsel engaged in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the U. S. ARMYDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Trout Unlimited v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Metcalf v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Sierra Club v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Shell Oil Company, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.