Legal Opinion

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the U. S. ARMY

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1971No. LR-70-C-203PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION NUMBER ONE

EISELE, District Judge.

The defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue for the following reasons;

“* * * the project sought to be enjoined by the plaintiffs is wholly within the Western District of Arkansas; the District Engineer’s office in charge of the proposed project is located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and performs no work within the Eastern District of Arkansas, and the property involved * * * lies within the Western District of Arkansas.”

The complaint names the Corps of Engineers of the United States Army as a defendant along with Stanley R.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scientists' Institute for Public Information, Inc. v. Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  5. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API