Legal Opinion

Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of Muskegon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1965No. Calendar 50, Docket 50,506PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

In this appeal plaintiff challenges the validity of PA 1959, No 266. Pursuant to legislative authorization purportedly contained in that act, by its amendment of section 14 of the general property tax law,1 the defendant township assessed plaintiff corporation taxes in the amount of $63,000 for the 1961 tax year upon the value of personal property *175consisting of machinery and equipment in plaintiff’s possession on December 31, 1960, the tax day, which it was using in the performance of government contracts, but title to which machinery and equipment was in the United States government.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Township of MuskegonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Waters Landing Ltd. Partnership v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Weaver v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Mooahesh v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API