McCarthy v. Emmons
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs in this case appeal from a judgment in their favor on the ground of inadequacy. No motion for new trial under V.R.C.P. 59, or to amend findings or judgment under V.R.C.P. 52(b), was filed in the trial court.
As we held in Fournier v. Estate of Loiselle, 132 Vt. 601, 602, 326 A.2d 155 (1974), the issue of adequacy of damages is one which must be preserved for the trial court’s consideration. Absent such presentation and ruling thereon, no ruling adverse to the plaintiff appears.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fournier v. Estate of LoiselleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carr v. CaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Swan v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978