Carr v. Case
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
This case involves the proper theory of liability of a dog owner whose dog, known to its owner to be dangerous, bites another person while restrained. Plaintiff-appellant Bernard J. Carr was awarded judgment for $3,672.00 against defendantappellee Warren Case following a jury trial. Appellant’s subsequent motions for additur, amendment of judgment and a new trial were denied, and he appealed. The question of the sufficiency of the damages having been preserved for the consideration of the lower court, the case is properly before us. Cf. McCarthy v. Emmons, 135 Vt. 450, 378 A.2d 107 (1977).
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Godeau v. BloodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
- Trapeni v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Davis v. BedellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Worthen v. LoveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- McCarthy v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eric Gross and Adrianne Gross v. Elizabeth Turner and Antonio FloresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Hillier v. NobleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Carmical v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
- Carvalho v. GrzankowskiDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.