Legal Opinion
1675 Realty Co. v. Quinones
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 6, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carl O. Callender, J.
In the instant matter the respondent tenant moves to *394dismiss the instant summary proceeding because, inter alla, the petitioner made an improper demand.
The demand made by the petitioner’s agent only specified an amount ($1,393.75) but did not define the period for which the rent claimed due covered. The respondent argues that such an omission represents a sufficient basis for dismissal of the case.
1. Requirement of RPAPL 711:
RPAPL 711 requires that a demand for rent be made as a precondition to commencing a nonpayment summary proceeding.
A. The general…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New York University v. FarkasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Solack Estates, Inc. v. GoodmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
- Zenila Realty Corp. v. MasterandreaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Ranalli v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Severin v. RouseCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kulok v. Riddim Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2000